π For hiring/tenure committees
TODO - this is not complete.
Choose your indicators
The RESQUE framework decisively promotes a βbuffett table approachβ: From the list of available indicators, hiring committees choose those which show a fit to the position and to the preferences and the research culture of the institution.
We provide a lean core set with the basic quality indicators that fit to the vast majority of research in any psycghological sub-discipline. This core set is recommended for all hiring committees (although any indicator can be deselected).
This can be expanded by multiple expansion packs that contain additional indicators. These packs are tailored to specific research areas or research cultures.
Currently, the selection of indicators itself (if you do not want to use the default core set) is done by adjusting the json files in the subfolder /packs of the collector app. In these config files, all indicators can be adjusted, removed, or new indicators added. We suggest that you fork our repository and make your changes in your personal copy. Currently, adapting the questions of the collector app requires some technical knowledge. However, we are happy to assist in customizing the app for your hiring committee.
Choose your weights
We make suggestions for weights that define how much each indicator contributes to the rigor score(s). But every committee can define their own weights.
If an indicator gets the weight 0 (but is not removed from the collector app), it becomes a descriptive indicator. It does not contribute to any quality score, but the committee still can see the answers.
- Show recommended paragraph in job ad
- cf. Lange et al.: Commit to weights and indicator sets when publishing the job ad; we recommend to publish the weights and indicators along with the ad.
- Template for instructions for applicants